APOPTOSIS, CANCER DEVELOPMENT AND A NEW OPTION FOR BETTER TREATMENT
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Engin
ULUKAYA
Medical Faculty of Uludag University, Department of Biochemistry, 16059, Bursa, TURKEY
Cell death classically results
from injury by agents such as toxins and ischemia, affects cells in groups
rather than singly, and evokes exudative inflammation when it develops in
vivo. This type of cell death is called necrosis. However, another type of
cell death was later defined, and was called programmed cell death (apoptosis).
The study of apoptosis did not attract much attention for quite a long time.
However, research on apoptosis has recently made a priceless impact on a number
of both physiological (e.g. remodelling of tissues, embryogenesis) and
pathological conditions (e.g. degenerative diseases, autoimmun disorders, and,
to a great extent, cancer) since it was first introduced in 1972. Apoptosis is
different to necrosis in some ways. For example, inflammatory response which
can cause further damage to surrounding tissue does not take place in
apoptosis, while it is evident in necrosis because of the leakage of cell
content into the intercellular space through cell membrane that is disrupted by
necrosis-causing agents. While necrosis might naturally occur in the centre of
tumor mass due to insufficiency of blood supply, apoptosis is rather implicated
in the process of carcinogenesis.
Tumor growth is determined not only by
increased cell division, but also by decreased rate of
physiologically-occurring cell death (apoptosis) in the multicellular
organisms. Most, if not all, cancer cells acquire resistance to the various
mechanisms that lead to apoptosis. Thereby, tumor cells escape apoptosis. This
resistance is accomplished either by continual action of deregulated
proto-oncogens (e.g. bcl-2) which ensure cells to maintain abnormally
prolonged life span or by inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins (e.g. p53)
which promote cell death when required.
Apoptosis of DNA-damaged cells
may constitute a physiological antineoplastic mechanism to protect the organism
from cancer development by eliminating cells that might otherwise replicate the
damaged DNA and lead to mutations and eventually to cancer. Hence, it becomes
more evident that the balance between cell proliferation and cell death
determines the normal tissue homeostasis. Moreover, there are more mechanisms for
tumor cells to grow by escaping apoptosis, all of which ensures tumor growth.
There are a number of ways in order for tumor cells to escape apoptosis. Among these
ways, Fas and FasL
interactions, presence of decoy receptors, decreased Bax expression, overexpression of FLIP (in mouse model),
overexpression of caspase inhibitors (cIAP2, Survivin), continual activation of
telomerase are particularly implicated. As well as blocking pro-apoptotic pathways,
cancer cells can upregulate anti-apoptotic pathways. The growth-factor-mediated
activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is particularly important in this regard. Apoptosis is also implicated in the
mechanism of cytotoxicity of a variety of chemotherapeutic agents (anti-cancer
drugs). Therefore, it is thought that understanding how the cell death program
is initiated by these drugs or any other kind of insults, and hence why it
fails to work for certain drugs, offers a novel approach to overcoming the
clinical problem of drug resistance (Makin and Hickman, 2000).
Presuming people are different to each other in terms of their apoptosis-related protein expressions, it can easily be concluded that individual variations in apoptotic program may cause differencies in the anti-cancer drug response. Taken together, the understanding of discrete apoptotic pathways will obviously contribute not only to the explanations of the development of cancer, but also the development of new strategies toward the prevention and therapy of cancer.
In the treatment of cancer, one
of the major modes of action of chemotherapeutic drugs is known to be via the
activation of apoptosis. It is thought that understanding how the cell death
program is initiated by following these drugs or any other kind of insults, and
hence why it fails to work for certain drugs, offers a novel approach to
overcoming the clinical problem of drug resistance (Makin and Hickman, 2000). The drug resistance, in other words chemo-resistance,
is one of the nightmare scenarios, which may be encountered during treatment of
cancer. To overcome this problem, the chemo-resistance (or even
chemo-sensitivity) to particular chemotherapeutics can be tested in vitro
on individual tumor tissue samples or biopsi specimens removed from cancer
patients. This approach looks as if it
is really going to revolutionise the way we use cancer drugs (Untch et al.,
2003; Whitehouse PA et al., 2003; Kurbacher
CM et al., 2003).
Makin G, Hickman JA. Cell Tissue Res 301:143-52, 2000
Untch M, et al. Recent Results Cancer Res: 161:146-158, 2003
Whitehouse PA et al. Anticancer drugs: 14: 369-375, 2003
Kurbacher CM et al. Recent Results Cancer Res 161:221-230, 2003